Recent Updates

Nitrogen loss potential in wet corn fields

From late April and throughout the month of May, many parts of Middle and West TN have received persistent rainfall that is well above the average for this period. These rains have produced persistently wet soil conditions and have coincided with sidedress N fertilizer application where most or all of the recommended N is applied. With this much rain, there is potential for N loss. Continue reading


Managing Palmer Amaranth and Grass Burndown Escapes

Author:  Comments Off on Managing Palmer Amaranth and Grass Burndown Escapes
Picture 1. Grass and Palmer amaranth escaping paraquat burndown in emerged cotton

There have been numerous fields where goosegrass, junglerice and Palmer amaranth were not controlled at burndown and the crop has emerged.  In some cases, the wet weather delayed burndown to where Palmer amaranth and those grasses were too large to be effectively controlled with one pass of Gramoxone (Picture 1).  In other cases, tillage used to help speed up field drying or to build beds partially buried pigweed and grasses which make effective burndown from Gramoxone very problematic (Picture 2). In a few cases, dicamba and glyphosate were used for burndown and they did not control those weeds due to resistance (Picture 3). Continue reading


Pre-Emerge Herbicide Injury in Soybean

Author:  Comments Off on Pre-Emerge Herbicide Injury in Soybean

The call of the last week was Pre-emerge herbicide injury in soybeans.  Several folks reported that their soybeans were “going backwards”. This is not a surprise as in wetter springs the probability of seeing injury from Pre-applied herbicides is greatly increased. That coupled with an increase in soybean acres this spring would increase the probability of herbicide injury in that crop. I would expect more of the same as we move into June with all the rain in the past few days.

Picture 1. Metribuzin injury on soybean

Continue reading


Yield potential and management of late planted cotton

Author:  Comments Off on Yield potential and management of late planted cotton

In almost every cotton-related conversation I had during early May, the conversation quickly turned to our excellent early planting window- a window which opened earlier in 2024 than any of recent memory.  Since then, most have fought to find an opportunity to mud in any acres and many are now considering shifting some farms to soybeans.  In this blog, I attempt to cover yield potential of a late planted cotton crop and highlight several very important factors to consider when planting cotton at the end of our ‘normal’ planting window. Continue reading


Fomesafen Carryover into Corn and Grain Sorghum

Author:  Comments Off on Fomesafen Carryover into Corn and Grain Sorghum

Carryover injury from fomesafen (Flexstar, Prefix, Reflex, Intimidator, Marvel, Dawn, Rhythm, etc.) is starting to show in a few corn fields.  This is because some  applications in late June and July in 2023 coupled with a very dry fall allowed the herbicide to persist into winter.  Recent rains then allow any herbicide carryover to more completely get into the soil solution.

Fomesafen carryover injury in corn and grain sorghum looks similar.  Expect to see stunting and interveinal chlorosis as pictures below sent from crop consultants clearly shows.

Striping of corn leaf veins characteristic of fomesafen carryover

Continue reading


Herbicide Corn Maturity Cutoffs

Author:  Comments Off on Herbicide Corn Maturity Cutoffs

Due to little time and very few good spray days, some corn fields have yet to have their layby application. Corn is putting on a new leaf every 3 days with all the heat and water. Therefore, time is short before it will be too mature to apply many herbicides safely over the top.

How large can corn be before glyphosate could potentially cause injury? The glyphosate label states it can be applied up through the V8 corn growth stage. My experience has been if glyphosate is applied to corn larger than that it can at times cause ears to be barren.  This phenomenon is difficult to predict ahead of time as it can vary due to maturity of the corn at application, hybrid and weather.

Crop stage and/or crop height is used to determine the cutoffs for a given herbicide.  Often the label states the limits at whichever (crop stage or crop height) comes first.  Crop stage can easily be done by counting the number of leaf collars that are fully exposed (Ex: 4 collars = 4 leaf) (Picture below).  If tankmixing, cutoff is always determined by the most limiting factor.

4 – Leaf Corn

Johnsongrass Escaping Glyphosate Burndown

Postemergence Corn Herbicides Crop Height Cutoff Crop Stage Cutoff
Accent 20 inches 6 leaf
Acuron GT 30 inches 8 leaf
Atrazine (Bicep, Degree Xtra, Acuron, etc.) 12 inches
Callisto* 30 inches (without atrazine)
Capreno* 20 inches 7 leaf (without atrazine)
Corvus 2 leaf
Dicamba (Clarity, etc.) 8 inches (1 pt/A) or
36 inches (1/2 pt/A)
5 leaf

Distinct 24 inches
Glyphosate – RR corn only 30 inches 8 leaf
Halex GT 30 inches 8 leaf
Armezon/Impact 8 leaf
Laudis 8 leaf
Liberty – LL corn only 24 inches 7 leaf
Diflexx 36 inches 10 leaf
Realm Q 20 inches 7 leaf
Resicore 11 inches
Resolve Q 20 inches 7 leaf
Roundup PM – RR corn only 8 leaf
Shield Ex 20 inches 6 leaf
Status 36 inches 10 leaf
Steadfast Q 20 inches 7 leaf
Storen 8 leaf
2,4-D 8 inches

*Note that if atrazine is added to herbicides such as Callisto or Capreno for example, the cutoff would be reduced to 12 inches.

 


Impregnated Pyroxasulfone (Zidua or Anthem Flex) on Fertilizer Application in Cotton Updated

Author:  Comments Off on Impregnated Pyroxasulfone (Zidua or Anthem Flex) on Fertilizer Application in Cotton Updated

Zidua (pyroxasulfone) applied via impregnated fertilizer in cotton has become popular in Tennessee. My understanding is that about 25% of the cotton acres last year had Zidua applied in this fashion. With the increasingly poor Palmer amaranth and grass control we are experiencing with dicamba + glyphosate, overlaying residual herbicides must be the foundation for weed control. Continue reading


EPA Requests Comments on Acephate Cancellation Proposal

Author:  Comments Off on EPA Requests Comments on Acephate Cancellation Proposal

The EPA is soliciting public comment on a registration review decision where the EPA proposes to cancel all uses of acephate, except for injections to non-food bearing trees. Acephate is widely utilized in Tennessee row crop agriculture and is a critical component of IPM programs. Cancelling an important crop protection product would place increased pressure on a limited number of control options available to producers.  We are encouraging agricultural professionals to comment to the EPA on the impacts acephate has on your production systems. If you need assistance with comments please contact your UT extension specialist. The link to comment is below. Deadline for comments is July, 1, 2024.

https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0915/document

EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0915