How large can corn be before glyphosate could potentially cause injury? The glyphosate label states it can be applied up through the V8 corn growth stage. My experience has been if glyphosate is applied to corn larger than that it can at times cause ears to be barren. This phenomenon is difficult to predict ahead of time as it can vary due to maturity of the corn at application, hybrid and weather.
Crop stage and/or crop height is used to determine the cutoffs for a given herbicide. Often the label states the limits at whichever (crop stage or crop height) comes first. Crop stage can easily be done by counting the number of leaf collars that are fully exposed (ex. 4 collars = 4 leaf) (Picture below).
4 leaf (collar) corn – V4 stage
Postemergence Corn Herbicides
Crop Height Cutoff
Crop Stage Cutoff
Accent
20 inches
6 leaf
Atrazine (Bicep, Degree Xtra, Acuron, etc.)
12 inches
–
Buctril
–
8 leaf
Callisto*
30 inches (without atrazine)
–
Capreno*
20 inches
7 leaf (without atrazine)
Corvus
2 leaf
–
Dicamba (Banvel, Clarity)
8 inches (1 pt/A) or
36 inches (1/2 pt/A)
5 leaf
–
Distinct
24 inches
–
Glyphosate – RR corn only
30 inches
8 leaf
Halex GT
30 inches
8 leaf
Hornet
24 inches
–
Armezon/Impact
–
8 leaf
Laudis
–
8 leaf
Liberty (Ignite) – LL corn only
24 inches
7 leaf
Diflexx
36 inches
6 leaf
Realm Q
20 inches
7 leaf
Resource
–
10 leaf
Resolve Q
20 inches
7 leaf
Roundup PM – RR corn only
–
8 leaf
Status
36 inches
10 leaf
Steadfast Q
20 inches
7 leaf
2,4-D
8 inches
–
*Note that if atrazine is added to herbicides such as Callisto or Capreno for example, the cutoff would be reduced to 12 inches.
In the second installment in our series on nutrient deficiencies in corn and soybean, this week we take quick look at phosphorus: symptomology, sources, and common causes.
Excessive rainfall over the weekend (5/12 and 5/13) in the North Western river counties has resulted in several calls this week concerning flooding and standing water in corn and to a lesser extent in soybean. Crop response will depend on the length of time the crop remains submerged and varies between corn and soybean. With rain still in the forecast for the next few days, here are a few agronomic considerations to be aware of. Continue reading →
Ryegrass infestations still persist in some fields. In cotton and soybeans, clethodim can be used now to push this weed on to maturity. In corn, other than just going out and spraying the typical POST corn premix and hoping that pushes the ryegrass on to maturity there is no real solution to controlling it. Continue reading →
This is the first of several installments dealing with commonly observed nutrient deficiencies in corn and soybean. Each week, a new macro or micro nutrient will be posted and discussed. The main objective of this series will be to discuss for each nutrient: (1) visual symptomology of deficiency, (2) plant and leaf tissue deficiency levels, (3) common causes of deficiency, and (4) in-season corrective measures. Continue reading →
Corn, cotton, soybeans, and wheat were down for the week.
The May 12 USDA WASDE report provided bearish projections for 2023 corn and soybean
supply and demand estimates. There remains a great deal of uncertainty with the 2023 crop, however if USDA projections are realized corn and soybean prices will be near $4.00 and $12.00 per bushel. Improved weather forecasts have national average trendline yield projected at 52 bu/acre and 181.5 bu/acre, both would be records if realized. U.S. ending stocks for the 2023/24 marketing year are projected at 2.222 billion bushels for corn (up 805 million bushels compared to the current marketing year) and 335 million bushels for soybeans (up 120 million compared to this year). The bearishness in soybeans is more prevalent internationally than domestically. Foreign soybean stocks are projected to increase 669 million bushels. Largely due to Brazil’s record production and a projected drought recovery in Argentina. As mentioned, there is still a lot of time and uncertainty embedded in this year’s crop but the USDA WASDE’s initial estimates for the 2023/24 marketing set a decidedly bearish tone. Continue reading at Tennessee Market Highlights.
With warm conditions moving into West TN, many producers are well underway with cotton planting. Below are a few things to consider with regards to thrips control.
ThryvOn: ThryvOn is Bayer’s new Bt technology that has activity on thrips and plant bugs. ThryvOn cotton varieties are very effective against thrips and it is not anticipated that any fields will need foliar treatments. ThryvOn will still have thrips present (adults and immatures) but insecticide applications should not be triggered on thrips numbers but damage level (Fig 1.). Applications should be initiated when plant damage is approaching 3 in figure 1. That being said, I’ve evaluated ThryvOn varieties for several years under excellent and terrible growing conditions and I as well as my colleagues across the cotton belt, have never recommended a foliar spray for thrips.
Insecticide Seed Treatments (ISTs): ISTs are the predominate control method for thrips in cotton. IST performance can be highly variable depending on weather conditions and thrips pressure. High thrips pressure and poor growing conditions will often necessitate the use of foliar sprays even with ISTs. Seed treatment packages typically come in a base (storage rate of imidacloprid + fungicide) and field rates of imidacloprid (these have several names) + fungicides, others may have nematicides, biologicals etc. Base treated seed may as well have no insecticide, the small stored product rate will offer almost no control of insects in the field. Standard options of imidacloprid (0.375 mg ai/seed) are the minimum needed for insect control in field cotton.
In-furrow: In-furrow liquid applications of imidacloprid are more effective than seed treatments; however, resistance development to neonicotinoids are diminishing the efficacy of imidacloprid in-furrow. Fields with in-furrow imidacloprid may still require a foliar spray under heavy thrips pressure. Granular AgLogic (aldicarb 15G) is highly effective against thrips populations and works like aldicarb should.
Foliar Spray Options: My recommendations are going to be limited for foliar sprays. Based on ongoing tobacco thrips resistance monitoring, to organophosphates (OPs), started by Scott Stewart several years ago, I am hesitant to recommend Orthene or Bidrin for thrips sprays. Resistance levels, in assayed populations from West TN, and the number of complaint calls I received last year are a good indication that OPs have limited use against our tobacco thrips populations. There may be areas where OP’s worked last year but it’s hard to say if they will work this year. That being said, Intrepid Edge at 3.0 fl oz/a is my go to for foliar thrips control. Although more expensive than the OPs, Intrepid Edge runs no risk of flaring mites or aphids and a surfactant has shown to increase efficacy (herbicide surfactants will work if you’re co-applying). Recolonization vs failure is another subject with foliar sprays. Presence of adults doesn’t mean the application didn’t work, adult thrips are always present on seedling cotton. Presence of immature thrips means adults are feeding and laying eggs and whatever control method you used is broken.
I am big believer in NCSU’s thrips predictor model https://products.climate.ncsu.edu/ag/cottontip/. We utilize the model to target planting when thrips numbers are highest, growers would do the opposite. Model runs for locations around West TN show that cotton planted May 1st through the 15th have a low to very low probability of experiencing large thrips populations. This is hopefully a welcome relief from years of cold, wet springs with large thrips populations plaguing our cotton. The warm, dryish weather will help germinate cotton quicker and standard ISTs may be enough to push us to the 4 true leaf stage (when thrips are typically no longer a concern) without a foliar spray.
My understanding is that some cotton planted this year will contain the ThryvOn trait. According to UT entomologist Sebe Brown these varieties will likely not require any POST foliar insecticide application for thrips. This is great as far as management for that pest but from a weed management perspective this could be a problem. Continue reading →