Category Archives: Cotton

Grass Weed Management Escapes

Infestation of goosegrass in cotton 2024

Serious infestations of goosegrass, junglerice and barnyardgrass have proven to be way too persistent in many cotton and soybean fields (Picture 1).  Many are getting frustrated with the lack of control seen with tankmixes that contain glyphosate and/or clethodim or quizalofop.  Some have asked if maybe some of these grasses have developed resistance to glyphosate, clethodim and quizalofop. Continue reading

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tarnished Plant Bugs Migrating into Squaring Cotton

Author:  Comments Off on Tarnished Plant Bugs Migrating into Squaring Cotton

I’ve received a few calls on adult tarnished plant bug migration into squaring cotton. Silking corn, blooming soybeans and flowering pigweed all contribute to large increases in plant bug numbers that make their way to ThryvOn and non-ThryvOn cotton.  ThryvOn’s bt gene can help reduce the amount of injury plant bugs inflict to squaring cotton but adults, especially large numbers of adults, can knock squares off of ThryvOn just like non-ThryvOn. I’ve seen ThryvOn cotton go from 90 plus percent square retention to sub 50 percent in 5 days due a large, consistent migration of adult plant bugs. The biggest benefit we see from ThryvOn is the reduction of plant bug immatures in bloom. That being said, you will typically see increased square retention in ThryvOn vs non-ThryvOn throughout the fruiting period. Scout your cotton and don’t ignore migrating plant bugs in ThryvOn or non-ThryvOn.  Also, many of the newer varieties begin squaring on the 5th or 6th node and we need to quickly transition from scouting for thrips to plant bugs.

TPB Adult
TPB Adult

Based on field reports, 2.0 oz/a of Centric is performing well on plant bug populations. Although the same class of chemistry, imidacloprid’s performance is fair at best and recolonization often happens quickly after an imidacloprid application. I try to not recommend consecutive applications of neonics due to efficacy falling off after the first shot. However, consecutive shots of neonics may be warranted for several reasons (cost, presence of mites, personal choice etc.) and on the second application I tend to increase rates of Centric to 2.5 oz/a especially if it was used previously. After the second application we’ve pretty much exhausted that chemistry. Other options are: acephate which carries a high risk of flaring mites and aphids especially in our current dry period, Vydate which is effective in killing plant bugs but has limited residual, roughly 36 hours, Bidrin isn’t labelled for plant bugs between first square and bloom, Transform, which is very effective, but is expensive and many want to save those shots for bloom unless aphids are present and Diamond. Diamond’s activity is best utilized in the 3rd week of squaring to first bloom window, several studies at MSU and UT have shown the best ROI of 6.0 fl oz/a Diamond during that time period.

Final note, I’ve received a few questions on squaring cotton having poor square retention but very few or no plant bugs are found scouting. Adult plant bugs, especially at this time of year, will move in and out of cotton quickly. The abundance of alternative hosts facilitates movement in and out of cotton without colonization. The take home is since most are scouting once a week, it is prudent to be more aggressive with applications and not risk square retention falling below 80% if you’re close. Monitoring square retention is one of, if not, the best way to determine if early-season treatments are working. Migrating adults can give the impression of an insecticide failure, but maintaining good square retention is a good indication that treatments are working.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Managing Palmer Amaranth and Grass Burndown Escapes

Author:  Comments Off on Managing Palmer Amaranth and Grass Burndown Escapes
Picture 1. Grass and Palmer amaranth escaping paraquat burndown in emerged cotton

There have been numerous fields where goosegrass, junglerice and Palmer amaranth were not controlled at burndown and the crop has emerged.  In some cases, the wet weather delayed burndown to where Palmer amaranth and those grasses were too large to be effectively controlled with one pass of Gramoxone (Picture 1).  In other cases, tillage used to help speed up field drying or to build beds partially buried pigweed and grasses which make effective burndown from Gramoxone very problematic (Picture 2). In a few cases, dicamba and glyphosate were used for burndown and they did not control those weeds due to resistance (Picture 3). Continue reading

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Yield potential and management of late planted cotton

Author:  Comments Off on Yield potential and management of late planted cotton

In almost every cotton-related conversation I had during early May, the conversation quickly turned to our excellent early planting window- a window which opened earlier in 2024 than any of recent memory.  Since then, most have fought to find an opportunity to mud in any acres and many are now considering shifting some farms to soybeans.  In this blog, I attempt to cover yield potential of a late planted cotton crop and highlight several very important factors to consider when planting cotton at the end of our ‘normal’ planting window. Continue reading

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Impregnated Pyroxasulfone (Zidua or Anthem Flex) on Fertilizer Application in Cotton Updated

Author:  Comments Off on Impregnated Pyroxasulfone (Zidua or Anthem Flex) on Fertilizer Application in Cotton Updated

Zidua (pyroxasulfone) applied via impregnated fertilizer in cotton has become popular in Tennessee. My understanding is that about 25% of the cotton acres last year had Zidua applied in this fashion. With the increasingly poor Palmer amaranth and grass control we are experiencing with dicamba + glyphosate, overlaying residual herbicides must be the foundation for weed control. Continue reading

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

EPA Requests Comments on Acephate Cancellation Proposal

Author:  Comments Off on EPA Requests Comments on Acephate Cancellation Proposal

The EPA is soliciting public comment on a registration review decision where the EPA proposes to cancel all uses of acephate, except for injections to non-food bearing trees. Acephate is widely utilized in Tennessee row crop agriculture and is a critical component of IPM programs. Cancelling an important crop protection product would place increased pressure on a limited number of control options available to producers.  We are encouraging agricultural professionals to comment to the EPA on the impacts acephate has on your production systems. If you need assistance with comments please contact your UT extension specialist. The link to comment is below. Deadline for comments is July, 1, 2024.

https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0915/document

EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0915

Print Friendly, PDF & Email